‘Staying Informed’ Shouldn’t Mean Constantly Retraumatizing Yourself

Consuming upsetting junk data is not your civic duty

Devon Price
Forge
Published in
6 min readOct 1, 2020

--

Photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images

In the age of doom scrolling, people tend to equate “staying informed” with “constantly retraumatizing yourself with endless exposure to new details about horrible issues you were already intimately aware of.”

It’s hard to stay away from Twitter, even if you’ve already read all the headlines, all the bad takes riffing on those headlines, and all the even worse takes riffing on those bad takes. Even though you already know how the presidential debate is gonna play out, it’s easy to feel some ethical obligation to watch it. You want to be informed.

Is it working? Is it helping? Is knowledge still power, or is there a point where it becomes a cage?

Knowledge can give people a sense of control and purpose, especially when that knowledge is provided by the internet — research shows that when people are holding their smartphones, they report feeling more psychologically powerful. When you take a person’s phone away, their confidence and sense of security drops.

Phones put us in contact with the wider world, granting us access to a new universe of constantly-updated information. But much of the “knowledge” on the internet is complete junk data, a…

--

--

Devon Price
Forge
Writer for

He/Him or It/Its. Social Psychologist & Author of LAZINESS DOES NOT EXIST and UNMASKING AUTISM. Links to buy: https://linktr.ee/drdevonprice