Child Proof

Teething Isn’t That Bad — But Many Teething Remedies Are

Amber necklaces and other popular products meant to ease babies’ discomfort are useless at best and dangerous at worst

Elizabeth Preston
Forge
Published in
4 min readJun 13, 2019

--

Photo: brusinski/Getty Images

The amber teething necklace 18-month-old Deacon Morin was wearing was supposed to ease his teething pain. But as the toddler napped at his Southern California daycare in 2016, he was strangled by the product; after being found unconscious by daycare workers, he was taken to the hospital, dying a few days later.

Amber necklaces have also played a role in other, non-fatal strangulations: In 2015, a mother in Australia reported that her 15-month-old daughter’s necklace had wrapped tightly around her neck while she slept; in 2016, researches published a case study of a similar incident with a 4-month-old in Canada. And this popular device isn’t just unsafe for babies and toddlers — it’s also almost certainly useless. Sellers say that when the beads are warmed by a baby’s body heat, they release a pain-relieving chemical called succinic acid into the skin, but there’s no scientific evidence to support the claim.

Amber necklaces are one of many teething “remedies” that probably do no good, but definitely have potential to harm. In a 2018 statement prompted in part…

--

--

Elizabeth Preston
Forge
Writer for

Elizabeth Preston is a freelance science journalist and humor writer in the Boston area.